West Harbour Residents Association
c/o John Macdonald 123
Burnet St.,
Oakville, Ont., L6K 1B9
December 13, 2005. cc.
Jim Brophy – Pres. WHRA
Bill Boughner – VP WHRA
Carol Gilbert – Sec. WHRA WHRA
Exec.
WHRA web site
Anne Mulvale - Mayor Fred
Oliver - Councilor
Cathy Duddeck - Councilor Mr. Allan Ramsey Senior Planner Community Planning P.O.Box 310 1225 Trafalgar Rd. Oakville, Ont. L6J 5A6 Dear Allan: Persuant to our numerous discussions over a
couple of years on this matter, I enclose the WHRA Report prepared by Hart
Jannson and under separate cover, the Gregg Daly Report which WHRA commissioned
on the C3 question. (Five copies of Daly
Report sent Dec.7) Before we begin, I’d like to thank you for
your patience and for all the meetings we have had. Basically we at WHRA have had to get up to
speed on Zoning/Planning issues. Historical Perspective Some twenty to thirty years ago, West
Harbour was still a Commercial area with Residential. The zoning was changed to Residential for
Burnet and south, to C3R for Lakeshore
and a C3 transition zone was predicted for the block between. This made perfectly good sense at the time
because it was the way East Oakville had evolved. Fast forward to 2005/2006 and we can see
that the prediction made for the transition zone just didn’t materialize. Other than Wilson st., every street,
forsythe, Chisholm, Kerr, Brant, and Brock has gone 100% Residential. Why then would we keep the prospect of
commercial usage open on these streets? 1)
Because we have
to protect the rights of Wilson St. commercial activity. The alternative solution is addressed in the
Walker Knott Report. 2)
Because a change
would impose a 10 foot buffer requirement onto the C3R owners. This too, has a solution which is in the
Walker Knott Report. 3)
Because you said
that there were no registered complaints from the C3 zoning. There are several reasons for this (a) you
register only those complaints which violate bylaws; (b) we are Canadians, we don’t complain about
neighbours; and (c) since it’s virtually
all Residential, there is no commercial activity anyway to complain about. However, let me give you my own
experience. I used to live at 101 Burnet
St (corner of Kerr.) (I’m now at 123
Burnet St.) The house north of 101
Burnet, on Kerr, contained a home of a family therapist. His clients always parked illegally on Kerr
in front of his or at the side of my house.
I rarely ever parked at the side because parking created a traffic
hazard due to visibility at the busy Kerr/Burnet intersection. I had to bag leaves because I couldn’t put
them at the curb due to the parking. I
had to reshovel snow banks which were pushed into my driveway entrance by the
clients. I was made uncomfortable by all
the people going by me, as I did my work outside, with low cast eyes, wanting
to retain their privacy. It was
unsuitable business activity for a pure residential area where parking was not
adequate and people are not prepared to walk, even from the Beer store parking
lot, 100 feet away. Did I complain? Never.
Would you have logged it? Yes,
because there was a parking infraction every day. The fact that our C3 residents and/or R4
residents backing onto C3, have not complained is not an issue. The issue is: What complaints would we have
if someone in C3 (other than Wilson) wanted to open a commercial establishment,
that would not be in keeping within the character of the now 100% residential
neighbourhood? We would all be spending
wasted dollars at OMB. What is the
point? Why dangle the prospect of
Commercial in a Residential area? You have asked us to answer all the
questions and objections associated with changing C3 to R7 for Forsythe,
Chisholm, Kerr, Brant and Brock. We have
done that. We have, with great expense,
had a professional Planner provide the solution. Changing this zoning is very important to
us. We request that you take this seriously
and recommend such a change to Council. Thank you for your support in this
matter. Please contact me if further
information is required.
Yours very truly, J.K.Macdonald
V.P. WHRA.